Inventor Yun-Xiao Li Bernd Jandeleit Mark A Gallop Noa Zerangue Peter A Virsik Wolf-Nicolas Fischer Original Assignee Xenoport Inc Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google Patents Internally masked neopentyl sulfonyl ester cyclization release prodrugs of acamprosate, compositions thereof, and methods of useĭownload PDF Info Publication number TW200932734A TW200932734A TW097139478A TW97139478A TW200932734A TW 200932734 A TW200932734 A TW 200932734A TW 097139478 A TW097139478 A TW 097139478A TW 97139478 A TW97139478 A TW 97139478A TW 200932734 A TW200932734 A TW 200932734A Authority TW Taiwan Prior art keywords compound formula group alkyl hydrogen Prior art date Application number TW097139478A Other languages Chinese ( zh) Google Patents TW200932734A - Internally masked neopentyl sulfonyl ester cyclization release prodrugs of acamprosate, compositions thereof, and methods of use
The main interconnected facets of archaeological ethnography as we propose it here are its critical refl exivity, its holistic and multi-sited nature, its multi-temporal rather than presentist character, its sensuous and sensory engagement with the world, its political commitment, and its conception as collective and team practice, which transcends the boundaries between the researcher and his or her diverse publics.TW200932734A - Internally masked neopentyl sulfonyl ester cyclization release prodrugs of acamprosate, compositions thereof, and methods of use Archaeological ethnography can bring to the fore these alternative engagements without necessarily endorsing their premises, being constantly alert to their political connotations and renderings. The production of his space requires a radical rethinking of the ontological and epistemological basis of archaeology, questioning the moder nist roots of offi cial archaeologies, and demonstrating the existence of other, public discourses, practices and engagements with the material past which can be defi ned as alternative archaeologies. Material traces from various times are at the centre of this emerging space. We argue that archaeological ethnography needs to be defi ned broadly, as a trans-disciplinary and transcultural space that enables researchers and diverse publics to engage in various conversations, exchanges, and interventions. We show its links and associations with both disciplinary and social-political trends in archaeology and in social anthropology in the last decades, and discuss some of the key recent work that has been carried out under this rubric. In this introductory essay to this volume, we chart and survey an emerging fi eld, that of archaeological ethnography.
0 kommentar(er)
